Yet Another Bulletin Board

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 23rd, 2006, 6:05am

Magic LibraryMagic Library HomeHome HelpHelp SearchSearch LoginLogin RegisterRegister NotificationNotification
Magic Library Forum « Artwork Change of Plateau »


   Magic Library Forum
   Archive (no new threads please)
   Standard Magic Products
(Moderators: Ralph Herold, l0qii, dragsamou)
   Artwork Change of Plateau
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1 2  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Artwork Change of Plateau  (Read 589 times)
Tenacious_Dyl
Full Member
***




Old Cards Rock

    ThoughtsForEatin
View Profile

Gender: male
Posts: 483
Artwork Change of Plateau
« on: Sep 28th, 2003, 12:48am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Hey all... not a particularily exciting post... but surely one worth laughing over... I was searching for misprints and errors on eBay... and look at this "very rare find!"
 
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3147223426&ca tegory=19115
 
well durh... it appears to be unlimited or revised... (my eyes are not good enough to tell from the scan) ...some misprint. Lately, I have seen more and more stupid auctions like this... sigh.
« Last Edit: Feb 24th, 2004, 2:30pm by Ralph Herold » IP Logged
monkeymadness
Junior Member
**



I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

   
View Profile

Posts: 38
Re: Not so misprint
« Reply #1 on: Sep 28th, 2003, 1:07am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

It has to be unlimited since it was between unlimited and revised when the art file became corrupted and the Plateau art was changed.  Certainly not a misprint as you say, but is worth the current $12 bid if in good shape.  At least it is not the "rare" misprinted Serendib Efreet with new art, no expansion symbol, and white border "pulled" from an Arabian Nights booster.
IP Logged
dry_cereal
Senior Member
****



donate crimps for the cause

294706841 294706841   feedmecakes   feedmecakes
View Profile WWW

Posts: 1770
Re: Not so misprint
« Reply #2 on: Sep 28th, 2003, 9:43am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

yeah, or the mox jet with the picture text and expansion symbol of a chub toad.
 
IP Logged

The first game of Magic ever was a drunken disaster
alpha fire elemental count = 6
standing offer = $130 for a crimped Summer card
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/bp43/crimps/crimppg1.htm
AXIOS
Senior Member
****




CREDENDO VIDES!!

   
View Profile WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 2222
Re: Not so misprint
« Reply #3 on: Sep 28th, 2003, 10:30am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

it's unlimited, since it has the old art.
 
i knew it was not a misprint (i'm iluvatar_666) but hé,
who doesn't want to pay 12 dollars for and dual  Grin Grin Grin
IP Logged


LOVES BIGFATPIMPY!!!!!!!!!
I WANT LOTS OF BOG WRAITHS, PLZ DONATE TO THIS POOR NETHERLANDI
mahdishain
Full Member
***





   
View Profile

Gender: male
Posts: 113
Re: Not so misprint
« Reply #4 on: Sep 29th, 2003, 5:19am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

greetings
 
perhaps someone can unravel my confusion. was unlimited badlands produced with both the beta and
revised art? if so, what is the story and is it the relative rarity of each version known?  
    mahdishain
IP Logged

practice peace
gamingjim
Full Member
***



One of the worlds Expert in Magic the Gathering

    gamingjim
View Profile

Gender: male
Posts: 119
Re: Not so misprint
« Reply #5 on: Sep 29th, 2003, 8:12am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

It came in Alpha, Beta, and unlimited. The reason the Pic is different is the film was lost or destroyed going in to Revised edition so that had some new art made.
IP Logged

Gamingjim
Looking for hard to find magic cards
email me
l0qii
Moderator
Full Member
*****




Give me arctic circle candy!

   
View Profile WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 414
Re: Not so misprint
« Reply #6 on: Sep 29th, 2003, 8:27pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 29th, 2003, 5:19am, mahdishain wrote:
greetings
 
perhaps someone can unravel my confusion. was unlimited badlands produced with both the beta and
revised art? if so, what is the story and is it the relative rarity of each version known?  
    mahdishain

 
 
 
There was only ever 1 version of the art for Badlands. Did you mean Plateau?
IP Logged

Magic the Gathering Stuff
Price Looker-Upper:Guide to Fake Cards:Vintage Ad Gallery
Looking for scans of any mtg ads! HELP!
Tenacious_Dyl
Full Member
***




Old Cards Rock

    ThoughtsForEatin
View Profile

Gender: male
Posts: 483
Re: Not so misprint
« Reply #7 on: Sep 29th, 2003, 9:36pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Ah-hah! The scheming monster himself (me!) just realized something more about the Wizard's printing process from this bit of data.
 
Ok... to start, at the beginning of the game they didn't seem to have much money, at least not as much as they do now, so if they could have helped it, and for normality's sake, they would have used the same art if possible.  
 
Here are some questions and comments I have drawn from this:
 
1) They say the Plateu art was destroyed or damaged in all cases I have seen of people discussing this. There is a difference between destroyed and damaged.... and there is no reason to use both words, which probably suggests whatever happened to the original art was hazy even at WotC... perhaps it was stolen, and if so, imagine the value on the underground market...
 
2) This also suggests that they NEED the original art to make the card. Yes, technically they need the film or whatnot, but they could always make new film from the old art, instead of buying new art, and making new film from that. So... we can say that the printing process uses some sort of larger media, like the film, or the actual image itself (unlikely). And... if it uses this film, and they couldn't make more it would suggest the ACTUAL plateu art was damaged, lost, or destroyed.  
 
3) WotC's presses must not use other types of media, or it is too expensive. Otherwise, someone could take a *high*-quality scan of an old Beta Plateu's art, and use that scan to make the newer cards art.
 
4) This also suggests that older cards plates/films (whatever is used in the final process) are immediately destroyed, erased, etc. Otherwise, like above, they could have used the older plates/films (whatever) to get art again for the Revised Version.
 
Comments? Anyone know more about the printing processes?
 
 
 
IP Logged
flatmatt
Senior Member
****




It's a Bear!

   
View Profile WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 639
Re: Not so misprint
« Reply #8 on: Sep 29th, 2003, 9:42pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Actually, from what I've read about the Plateau art, the computer file with the original art was corrupted, and the artist no longer had the piece for one reason or another.  I don't remember exactly what they said.  I believe it was in an Ask Wizards some time back.
IP Logged

It's a Bear! - My Bear collection - Website now faster!
MOTL H/W List
Ralph Herold
Administrator
*****






   
View Profile WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 1189
Re: Not so misprint
« Reply #9 on: Sep 29th, 2003, 10:54pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I can confirm what flatmatt said. It is exactly what I remember.
IP Logged
motorcitymagic
Senior Member
****




Voted Best-loved Forum Member of 2004.

  motorcitymagic  
View Profile WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 584
Re: Not so misprint
« Reply #10 on: Sep 29th, 2003, 11:17pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=mtgcom/arcana/35
IP Logged

MTG Archive - a free online encyclopedia devoted to Magic
monkeymadness
Junior Member
**



I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

   
View Profile

Posts: 38
Re: Not so misprint
« Reply #11 on: Sep 29th, 2003, 11:17pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Here is a brief version of the whole story:
 
If you've ever seen an older (Unlimited or before) version of the dual-land Plateau, you probably noticed that the art used in those editions was different than that on the more plentiful Revised version.
 
The swap was not intentional. Between the printing of Unlimited and Revised, the computer file of the Drew Tucker art became corrupted and the original painting was lost, leaving the production team with no reasonable way to create a high-quality image. Luckily, art for dual-lands had been commissioned for the then-upcoming Ice Age set.
 
R&D eventually determined that dual-lands were too powerful to put into Ice Age, meaning the art wouldn't be needed for that set. So the Cornelius Brudi Plateau painting was then used as a stand-in for the original in the base set, and was actually misattributed to the original artist, Drew Tucker.
 
http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=mtgcom/arcana/35
IP Logged
Tha_Gunslinga
Full Member
***




Crimpeder Than Thou

    ThaGunslingaMOTL
View Profile WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 276
Re: Not so misprint
« Reply #12 on: Sep 30th, 2003, 7:19pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I believe the original art for Plateau was sold.  Not sure where I heard this, but I definitely remember seeing it somewhere.
IP Logged

Dry Cereal and I are tighter than two crimps in a pack. Ben & Ben, the crimpsters.

Crimp count: 1010
Newest crimps:

Army of Allah
Anarchist (foil)
Niall Silvain
Deranged Hermit
Banshee (CH
TerraFrost
Senior Member
****



I love phpBB 2.0.15!

   
View Profile WWW

Posts: 694
Re: Not so misprint
« Reply #13 on: Oct 2nd, 2003, 6:29am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

i wonder how long it took for WotC to realize that it miscredited...  because summer magic sure didn't fix it:
 
IP Logged

BLACK LOTUS DONATIONS NEEDED!

CURRENT COUNT: 0

Tenacious_Dyl
Full Member
***




Old Cards Rock

    ThoughtsForEatin
View Profile

Gender: male
Posts: 483
Re: Not so misprint
« Reply #14 on: Oct 2nd, 2003, 11:17pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

If you look on Wizard's link above, it says tucker on the revised one too. Oh well... quality control I guess. Maybe the picture was added last minute. Who knows?
IP Logged
Pages: 1 2  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Magic Library Forum » Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.3.1!
YaBB © 2000-2003. All Rights Reserved.